This post is about a Porsche. The Porsche Mission E electric vehicle, (watch a quick video below). Not just because it looks like a nice car but because it shows that high performance electric vehicles are no longer the business of specialist EV companies like Tesla. They’re becoming mainstream. We’re watching the clean future of driving unfold around us.
Dd I mention that Porsche is developing a battery that will charge to 80% in 15 minutes?
This is genuinely great climate news! New research suggests the goal of keeping global temperature increase to 1.5C is more achievable than was previously thought. With strong and immediate global action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions we can limit warming to 1.5C, a task that has been seen as desirable but unrealistic.
Why is this important? Well, for one, it makes the 1.5C “aspirational” target agreed on by the world’s nations as part of the Paris Agreement in 2015 more realistic. Secondly, it provides impetus for the type of stronger, near-term climate action from governments and businesses around the world that would be necessary to achieve this target.
It’s a big challenge but knowing that it’s achievable will ideally help spur global climate action.
As the above tweet illustrates, the price of offshore wind power in the UK is half what the UK government predicted it would be in 2030! Subsidies for offshore wind energy in the UK have more than halved in less than three years reflecting the falling costs of the energy it produces. The UK government awards contracts-for-difference for offshore wind farms to companies who can provide energy with the smallest subsidy over a set time period. This encourages companies to compete by lowering the costs of the technology and they appear to be securing significant reductions.
“When you look back in 10 years from now, we’ll see this period around 2016-17 as an inflection point. The cost of offshore wind, also solar and onshore wind, is coming down at such speed that nobody could have predicted.” Henrik Poulsen
Sometimes you just need to rant about the craziness that is the world diving headlong into environmental destruction while continuing to live as normal and this rant from the environmental journalist George Monbiot takes the cake.
Everything I see – the giant cars driven 100m to school, the bottled water, the packaging and the junk it contains – seems utterly mad
Politicians seem to have drifted away from principled leadership to managerialism, focused on small, almost cosmetic fixes to a system that many feel has let them down.
This is great line from the author and activist Iyad El-Baghdadi. It’s intended as a description of one of the key failures of contemporary politics but is particularly apt as a description of the responses of many national governments to climate change and environmental issues more broadly.
So often climate change is framed as a threat to which requires simple technocratic responses, for instance reshaping the market through incentives and regulation or reducing energy use through energy efficiency measures. These are important no doubt but considering the scale of the response needed to tackle climate change what’s lacking is a unifying vision for national , even global efforts. Fighting climate change will require not just technological and economic solutions but political and democratic ones that unify and galvanise public opinion behind climate action. This is where vision and clear plans are so important but still so lacking.
El-Baghdadi argues that a large part of the problem of resurgent authoritarian nationalism around the world today and the public dissatisfaction fueling it can be traced to the “lack of a plan” amongst our leaders which results in a tendency to simply leave the system to run on “bureaucratic auto-pilot”. This seems eminently true in the case of climate change where the complexity of the problem and the power of oppositional vested interests like fossil fuel companies shows up in the lack of a consistent and strong plan for dealing with it. Tackling climate change can not simply be left to the market. Action must be galvanised with strong national and global visions and plans like the Paris Agreement to cap the increase in average global temperatures to 2C. And a vision for tackling climate change should focus on solutions in order to encourage public support for action and may even benefit from framing renewable energy as a patriotic project or cause. Most importantly people need to be convinced that they will benefit from this vision whether through jobs, cheap, clean energy or leaving a livable world for their kids.
The lack of a plan to deal with climate change leaves a space for opposition and invites costly delay. A plan and a vision, particularly for national governments will complement necessary technocratic solutions and strengthen public support for creating a clean energy future and avoiding the worst impacts of climate change.
Photo at top: Department of Energy Solar Decathalon on Flickr
Think about the last thing you purchased. Whether it was a car, a cardigan or a carrot, what were the main considerations in deciding your purchase? Like most people they were likely what you would get out of it. Whether the car would fit your family, the cardigan was cheap or whether the carrot looked good enough to eat.
Buying things is a personal decision. You exchange money you’ve earned for a good or service that you need or desire. Businesses thrive by encouraging us to purchase their products and our economy grows through greater consumption. In other words, framing the act of purchasing as simply a personal decision is good for business.
Yet the simple exchange of money for goods or services connects us to a whole chain of production with many inputs of labour and resources and which often reaches around the world. It can also have hidden costs that we don’t consider or aren’t even told about. What are the carbon emissions of that car? Was the person who made that cardigan paid a livable wage? Has that carrot passed cosmetic standards which reject less good looking carrots from sale causing food waste? All of this is obscured by the ease and convenience of purchasing online or in a shop and behind smart marketing and branding which motivates based on emotion and self-interest.
This isn’t to say that if everyone made ethical purchases we would solve the inequities of business and the economy. Solving these issues will also require activism, legislation, changes in business models, cultures and accountability and technological advances. What is important though is that we frame and understand the act of purchasing not as an isolated unit of economic activity or as simply a personal act but as inherently social and environmental. Every time we buy something we are having an impact on the world. And this view needs to permeate our culture, business and government.
Luckily we’ve already started. We’re twigging to the health impacts of what we buy and businesses are responding with everything from more yoga classes to an ever expanding range of health foods. So too awareness of environmental impacts is leading to more environmentally friendly products like electric vehicles, ethical clothing or vegetarian, fair trade and organic foods.
The greater our understanding of the impacts of our purchases and the more we see the act of purchasing as connecting us to the world the more we can not only reduce our impact on others and the planet but help them.
There’s just something so satisfying about incorporating greenery into buildings. Maybe it’s the hippy in me but vertical forests and green roofs have great appeal if for no other reason than increasing our connection to nature within our urban environments.
Of course they also have myriad benefits from providing insulation and shading, thus reducing energy usage in buildings, to reducing carbon emissions, improving air quality, helping stop flooding and even providing urban habitats for wildlife. Take the green roof on the Javits Center in New York. This 6.75 acres space is “home to 17 bird species, five bat species and 300,00 honeybees.”
This vertical forest on a building being constructed in Taiwan is set to feature 23,000 trees which will hopefully absorb 130 tonnes of carbon dioxide a year.
In China, work is underway on a new ‘forest city‘ which will be home to 30,000 people plus 40,000 trees and one million plants which will produce 900 tonnes of oxygen a year and absorb 10,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide.
Vertical forests, green roofs and design elements like food growing balconies may not solve all our environmental problems. They will however provide a valuable connection to the natural world within our cities and in our daily lives that can surely only increase the way we value it, an important step for ensuring environmentally sustainable business, attitudes, behaviours, design and policies.